Isaiah 30

Isaiah was an early warning system. God gave him glimpses of the future and told him to warn his people about what was coming. But they didn’t want to listen: 

For these are rebellions people, deceitful children, children unwilling to listen to the Lord’s instruction. They say to the seers, “See no more visions!” and to the prophets, “Give us no more visions of what is right! Tell us pleasant things, prophesy illusions. Leave this way, get off this path, and stop confronting us with the Holy One of Israel!” 

-- Isaiah 30:9-11 

The problem was that shutting your eyes and closing your ears to a problem doesn’t make it go away. Asssyria was going to invade Judah, and there was nothing that could be done about it. It would be like a tiny Caribbean island going up against the U.S. Army. Isaiah wanted his people to admit their helplessness and turn to God. They turned to Egypt instead: 

“Woe to the obstinate children,” declares the Lord, “to those who carry out plans that are not mine, forming an alliance, but not by my Spirit, heaping sin upon sin; who go down to Egypt without consulting me; who look to help for Pharoah’s protection, to Egypt’s shade for refuge.” 

-- Isaiah 30:1-2 

Modern people would agree that the people of Isaiah’s days were children, but for very different reasons. Isaiah is saying they are children in comparison to God. We think they were children in comparison to us.

That is certainly true in some respects. A Jewish peasant in 700 BC would have no idea what to make of modern technology. We have learned a lot in the last 3,000 years. The modern worldview looks at history as the story of progress and enlightenment. Life has never been better, and it will keep on getting better as long as we believe in science. We don’t need to worship an imaginary man in the sky. We have become masters of our own lives. Worshipping the same God as Stone Age people seems needlessly primitive, if not barbaric. 

Modern man is the Imperial general in the first Star Wars movie, thumbing our nose at the idea that there is any limitation to our power: 

General: Any attack by the rebels against this station would be a useless gesture, no matter what technical data they have obtained. This station is now the ultimate power in the universe. I suggest we use it. 

Vader: Don’t be too proud of this technological terror that you have constructed. The ability to destroy a planet is insignificant next to the power of the Force. 

General: Don’t try to frighten us with your sorcerous ways, Lord Vader. Your sad devotion to that ancient religion has not helped you conjure up the stolen data tapes, or given you clairvoyance enough to find the rebel’s hidden fortress. 

Vader: I find your lack of faith disturbing. 

The religious worldview says that modern man is still a child, no matter how advanced our technology. And that our notion of progress is a myth because there are certain aspects of the human condition that cannot be overcome. 

Has science and technology made us happier? Or do we struggle with the same things that plagued our ancestors thousands of years ago? One of the interesting things about reading ancient history like the Book of Isaiah is that it gives you a better appreciation for how similar life was back then. They weren’t all living in huts. There were massive cities filled with people from all over the world by 700 BC. Their societies had been around for thousands of years. There were people who thought society was progressing to a better place, and those who thought things were going the wrong way. There were plagues and viruses that emerged out of nowhere. People were born, they got old, got sick, and they died. They looked for meaning in their lives, and wondered why they were here. 

I’m in a Slack channel at work for parents of small children. Two weeks ago, as the results of the presidential election came in, one of them asked what people told their kids about all the problems in society. How do you explain the existence of racism and evil and injustice in the world? 

There are three possible answers to that question: Believe in Man, believe in God, or believe in nothing. Modern man chooses the first. We say that things have gotten better from the past and will keep getting better from here. To quote Barack Obama, the arc of the moral universe bends towards justice. 

The hardest part of 2020 for most people (and really the last four years) is that it has shaken their faith in progress. Maybe things won’t get better. Maybe people will be as ignorant and selfish a century from now as they were three thousand years ago. One meme that popped up a lot during the election was what we would tell our grandkids about how we voted in 2020. But the reality is that our grandkids probably won’t care. You think they won’t have problems of their own in 2080? 

The religious worldview says the hearts of men do not change. We will never figure things out on our own. Our societies will always be riven with strife and conflict. People have been oppressing and killing each other since the beginning of time, and will keep on doing it until the end of time. Jesus said the poor will always be with us. (Mark 14:7). God has provided more than enough resources in this world. But we are incapable of splitting them up evenly. Politics will never give us all the answers. It only replaces old problems with new ones: 

“A conservative is one enamored of existing evils; a liberal wants to replace them with new ones.” -- Ambrose Bierce 

The skeptic who sees the human condition for what it really is but refuses to accept God will end up embracing nihilism and despair. Religion is the only way to maintain hope in a world without any. 

There's no real reason to believe in mankind. We are mortal beings trapped in a cold and uncaring universe far bigger and older than we can ever imagine. 

The Bible calls us children because we don’t know what’s good for us. A child wants to eat candy all day because it tastes good in the moment. They don’t understand the long-term consequences of their decisions. Adults are no different. We have limited lifespans that prevent us from seeing the full consequences of our decisions. Go back through history and you can see that it often takes hundreds of years for that process to play out. 

We try to build statistical models to predict what will happen 50 years from now and we don’t even know what will happen tomorrow. The last two presidential elections have shown that scientific polling is no more reliable a guide than consulting oracles or gutting animals and looking at the shape of their intestines. It’s all guessing. The future is inherently unknowable. Who was talking about the coronavirus a year ago? 

Now listen, you who say, "Today or tomorrow we will go this or that city, spend a year there, carry on business and make money." Why, you do not even know what will happen tomorrow. What is your life? You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes.

-- James 4:13-14

There are only a couple of predictions that have stood the test of time. A society that turns its back on God will fall apart, and people that walk with God will be happier and more fulfilled. The stuff Isaiah was saying thousands of years ago still holds true today. So you can either listen to him or you can believe what you are told on TV and tell yourself that this time things will be different. 

Jordan, LeBron, and Jesus

Stephen A. Smith accidentally said something revealing in one of the endless televised debates about LeBron James and Michael Jordan over the last month: 

“As long as I’m living and breathing, and I’ve got breathe in my body, and I got a voice, and I got vocal cords, you will me hear say LeBron James is no Michael Jordan.”

To paraphrase George Orwell, if you want a picture of the future of the NBA, imagine an Air Jordan stomping on the face of every great young player -- forever. The present must always pay homage to the past. Michael Jordan is the Greatest Of All Time. The discussion is over. He dominated the toughest era in league history. The NBA isn’t what it was. It will never be that way again. 

People like Stephen A. talk about him in the same way the Apostle John talks about Jesus. Replace a few words and this could be on First Take: 

That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched -- this we proclaim concerning the Word of life. The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and has appeared to us. We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us. And our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ. We write this to make our joy complete. 

-- 1 John 1:1-4 

Someone who lived through Jordan’s prime knows that being greater than him is about much more than checking a few boxes. Stephen A. has said he doesn’t care if LeBron wins six or even seven championships. It still wouldn’t be enough. He’s not invincible. Not like MJ. 

The problem is that there are fewer and fewer people like him in a position to really understand that. The people who saw Jordan in the flesh are all getting older. They won’t always be around to tell us about him. 

Jordan vs. LeBron is basketball’s version of Jay Leno vs. Conan O’Brien. People cared about which comedian would host an irrelevant TV show because the two represented something more than themselves. Conan was a Generation Xer who waited his turn while the Baby Boomer hung onto the job well past when he should have retired. Leno was the Baby Boomer getting rushed out the door for a fresher face even though he was still on top of the game. 

Stephen A. (53) is four years younger than Jordan (57). When he’s talking about MJ, he’s really talking about himself. What happened in the 90s matters. He matters. It’s the cry of a man screaming into a void and hoping to hear breath in his lungs. 

The same thing is happening when Nick Wright (36) talks about LeBron (35). Wright was six when Jordan beat the Bad Boy Pistons. He missed that era of that NBA. But what happened in the 2010s matters too. Why are we so sure that the game was better 30 years ago? Just because the people who were around back then say so? 

LeBron, like so many other Millenials, is being judged by historical standards that aren’t relevant to his life. The league is different than in Jordan’s day. The rules are different. The two barely even play the same sport. No one is winning a title in 2020 running the Triangle Offense. Saying LeBron could never be as great as Jordan because he needed to team up with other stars is like saying a modern college student could never be as great as one from the 1960s because he needed to take out loans to pay his tuition. Times have changed. 

Jordan had his time. And that time is over and is never coming back. LeBron has his time now. It will end too. For all people are like grass, and their glory is like the flowers of the field. The grass withers, and the flower fades. (Isaiah 40:6-8) 

There’s a reason few people bring up Wilt Chamberlain or Bill Russell in GOAT conversations anymore. Russell won his first NBA title in 1957. A 12-year old who watched that live would be 75 in 2020. Most of the people who watched with him are dead. A 12-year old who watched Jordan win his first title in 1991 is 41 in 2020. He might still think that Jordan is the GOAT when he’s 75 in 2054. Do you think people will still listen? Do you think they will still care? 

Calling anyone the GOAT at anything is fairly ridiculous. Who are any of us to say? Stephen A. is right in the sense that you can’t really judge something unless you saw it for yourself. Only a basketball fan who had watched the game faithfully since the 1950s is really qualified to speak on it. There aren’t many of those folks left. And I don’t see any of them on TV. The span of human history goes back thousands and thousands of years. No one was around for all of it. All we can really say is who was the greatest in a particular era. 

But that’s not enough. We don’t want to be confined to a particular era when making those judgments because we don’t want to think about lives being confined to a particular era. God has put a desire for eternity on the human heart. And yet we can never fulfill it. (Ecclesiastes 3:11) 

Art (and sport is a subsection of art) is an attempt to do so. People write songs and make movies for the same reason they drew animals on the walls of caves. It’s why Jay Z made a song called Young Forever. It’s why Martin Scorcese and Robert DeNiro made The Irishman. That’s a movie about a bunch of old men reliving the 1960s one last time, using digital effects to pretend that they are younger than they are, and trying to make the cultural figures from their youth relevant to a modern audience. But Jimmy Hoffa doesn’t matter to anyone not in the AARP. And, if we’re being honest, neither does JFK. 

Soon enough, no one will care that this country ever existed. Americans have trouble grappling with our societal mortality because we are raised to believe that the United States is the culmination of history. Everything built toward the moment where the Founding Fathers founded a republic on the idea that all men are created equal and deserved the chance to rule themselves. That dream must never die. But, of course, it will. Nothing lasts forever. 

We think that the end of the U.S. means the end of the world when really it is just the end of our world. There’s a lot of talk about how the future of our democracy is at stake in this election. Maybe that’s true. But our democracy was always going to end one day. Life will go on. The world will keep spinning. People will still be born, fall in love, have kids, get old, and die. Oceans rise and empires fall. Nothing ever really changes. There is nothing new under the sun. 

There is only one name that will last forever and it’s not Michael Jordan. And there’s only one idea that will last forever and it’s not The American Dream. There’s a through line running through human history that you can find if you have eyes to see: 

But as I consider this shifting and odd variety of customs and beliefs in different ages, I find in one corner of the world a peculiar people, separated from all other peoples of the earth, who are the most ancient of all and whose history is earlier by several centuries than the oldest histories we have. 

I find this great and numerous people descended from one man, worshipping one God, and living according to a law which they claim to have received from his hand. They maintain that they are the only people in the world to whom God has revealed his mysteries; that all men are corrupt and in disgrace with God, that they have all been abandoned to their senses and their own minds; and that this is the reason for the strange aberrations and continual changes of religions and customs among them, whereas these people remain unshakeable in their conduct; but that God will not leave the other peoples forever in darkness, that a Redeemer will come, for all; that they are in the world to proclaim him to men; that they have been expressly created to be the forerunners and heralds of this great coming, and to call all peoples to unite with them in looking forward to this Redeemer. 

-- Blaine Pascal

Isaiah 29

Isaiah called everything before it happened. If you read the Book of Isaiah in 700 BC, you would have been prepared for every major geopolitical event in the ancient Middle East over the next few hundred years, as well as the way Christianity would change the world.

But few of his peers listened. Isaiah explained why in Chapter 29: 

The Lord has brought over you a deep sleep; He has sealed your eyes (the prophets); he has covered your heads (the seers). 

For you this whole vision is nothing but words sealed in a scroll. And if you give the scroll to someone who can read, and say, “Read this, please,” they will answer, “I can’t; it is sealed.” 

Or if you give the scroll to someone who cannot read, and say, “Read this, please”, they will answer, “I don’t know how to read.” 

— Isaiah 29:10-12 

According to Isaiah, God seals the minds of non-believers to prevent them from knowing the truth. The people of Judah had turned away from God, ignoring His commands and living by their own rules. This was their punishment: 

He said, “Go and tell this people: ‘Be ever hearing, but never understanding; Be ever seeing, but never perceiving.’ Make the hearts of this people calloused; make their ears dull and close their eyes. Otherwise they might see with their ears, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts, and turn and be healed.” 

— Isaiah 6:9-10 

So why say anything at all? Because what Isaiah was saying wasn’t for their benefit. It was all for the people who came after them who would be able to understand his prophecies with the benefit of hindsight. God was calling His own shot. He was leaving the evidence of His hand in world events for anyone who cared enough to investigate: 

 “Tell us, you idols, what is going to happen. Tell us what the former things were, so that we may consider them and know their final outcome. Or declare us to the things that come, tell us what the future holds, so that we may know that you are gods.” 

— Isaiah 41:22-23 

But people who don’t want to believe in God can always find ways to ignore what is right in front of them. There’s no question that the Book of Isaiah contains predictions of future events that no mortal human being could have made on their own. Even the historical scholarship recognizes that. But rather than acknowledge the hand of God in its creation, they created a byzantine conspiracy theory where several Isaiahs (if not dozens) worked together over hundreds of years to falsify a work of “prophesy”. 

And what’s their proof? The fact that no one living in Judah in 700 BC should have been able to so accurately describe what would happen in Babylon and Persia in 500 BC! In other words, they are assuming their own conclusions and calling it science. 

Science is the foundation of the way Americans understand the world. We don’t believe anything that isn’t first proven in a scientific paper. That’s why there are so many studies that try to prove things that used to be called “common sense.” You aren’t allowed to draw conclusions from your lived experience, or benefit from the accumulated wisdom of thousands of years of human society. Those people weren’t “modern”. They hadn’t been Enlightened yet. Where were their iPhones!? 

But the deeper mysteries of the human condition cannot be answered by the scientific method. Why do we exist? How should we live our lives? And what happens to us after we die? 

 

There is no way to design a controlled experiment in a lab to prove or not prove the existence of God. It's the same with any other metaphysical claim. That is why most Americans don't really have firm religious beliefs. They will tell you they believe in love or progress or that they are spiritual but not religious or that they are open-minded about supernatural claims. 

The problem is that there are still some things you have to take on faith. Human beings have to live by first principles because the world is too complicated for us to understand without them:

For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears. When I was a child, I talked in child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me. For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror [emphasis added]; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known. 

— 1 Corinthians 13:10-12 

There's a reason that these are the some of the first lines in the Declaration of Independence: 

We hold these truths to be self-evident [emphasis added], that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among those are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. 

Imagine trying to design a scientific experiment to prove whether or not all men are created equal. It's absurd. That's not something you can prove. You just accept that it's true and work from there. It's the same thing with God. 

Christianity is like any other belief system. It has a lot of claims that have to be taken on faith. Either Jesus rose from the grave or he didn’t. None of us were there to say what actually happened. Either his sacrifice on the cross was an adequate substitute for our sins or it wasn’t. None of us can die and report back. There is a veil that stands between us and true knowledge of the universe. Either it will be broken when we die or it won’t.

Modern skeptics have made fun of some of those unfalsifiable claims by creating a religion they call The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Their point is that you can't prove or disprove the existence of a FSM that exists in space anymore than you can the Christian God.

It's a fair point. There's nothing stopping anyone from believing in a spaghetti monster. But it doesn't prove quite as much as they think. 

Choosing to believe in something means choosing to accept its assumptions about the world. So instead of asking someone to disprove a flying spaghetti monster, you have to ask yourself what it means to believe in it. What does it tell us about the world? What does it say about how we should live our lives? In other words -- what are its first principles? 

This is the idea behind the analogy of the "red pill" and the "blue pill" in The Matrix. Taking a "pill" is like accepting the first principles of a belief system. You just swallow them on faith and they change the way you look at the world around you.

There's a certain point on the road to God where you have to walk by faith instead of sight. It's only when you choose to believe in God that everything else makes sense. But you have to make that choice with your heart, not your head. You have to swallow the pill and see where it takes you. That's too much for modern people who think they can figure out the world on their own. They don't need to believe in fairy tales. They don't have to accept the limitations of the human condition.

That's what Isaiah means when he says non-believers are "blinded" from the truth. They made the wrong choice about what to believe. Do that and you might just end up worshipping spaghetti: 

For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal human beings and birds and animals and reptiles.

- Romans 1:21-23

Isaiah 28

God made a deal with the people of Israel. He made them His people and gave them a land of milk and honey. All they had to do in return was follow a list of rules in the Old Testament. Doing that would create a holy kingdom that would bless not only themselves but the whole world. 

But instead of changing the world, the world changed them. They didn’t want to live by a different standard than everyone else. They wanted to be just like everyone else. Who was God to tell them what to do? Isaiah describes how they viewed His commands: 

“Who is it he is trying to teach? To whom is he explaining his message? To children weaned from their milk, to those just taken from the breast? For it is: Do this, do that, a rule for this, a rule for that; a little here, a little there.” 

— Isaiah 28:9-10 

He spent most of his life warning his countrymen about what would happen if they didn't change. They had turned what was supposed to be God’s kingdom on earth into an evil and unjust society. What had been given them could just as easily be taken away. If they wouldn’t list to warnings through prophets like Isaiah, God would send messengers like the Assyrians: 

Very well them, with foreign lips and strange tongues God will speak to this people, To whom he said, “This is the resting place, let the weary rest;” and “This is the place of repose” — but they would not listen. 

So then, the word of the Lord to them will become: Do this, do that, a rule for this, a rule for that; a little here, a little there — So that as they go they will fall backward; they will be injured and captured. 

— Isaiah 28:11-13 

Isaiah uses the metaphor of the vineyard to describe God’s relationship with His chosen people. His vineyard (Israel) has gone bad so He would tear it down and start over. The new one would be much different. It would be a different kind of society based on a different set of rules: 

“See, I lay a stone in Zion, a tested stone, a precious cornerstone for a sure foundation; the one who relies on it will never be stricken with panic. I will make justice the measuring line and righteousness the plumb line; hail will sweep away your refuge, the lie, and water will overflow your hiding place.” 

— Isaiah 28:16-17 

The Messiah would be the cornerstone of God’s new kingdom on Earth. Under the old system, the Jewish people earned their righteousness by following The Law and sacrificed animals to atone for the times they broke it. The Messiah would be the sacrifice under the new system. His righteousness would cover the sins of God’s people: 

“But he was pierce for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to our own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.” 

— Isaiah 53:5-6 

It’s not possible for mankind to save ourselves. The history of Israel in the Old Testament is proof of that. So is the state of our world today. That’s why the new system that God was setting up wouldn’t depend on the righteousness of man. We would no longer have to do anything to earn our salvation. We could just accept the gift we had been given. 

That logic applies to more than just God's people. The word of God would no longer be limited to one group in one corner of the world. The Messiah would invite everyone in and expand the blessing originally given to Abraham and his descendants to the entire world. Isaiah compares God’s people to a childless woman who would be unexpectedly blessed with offspring:

“Sing, barren woman, you who never bore a child; burst into song, shout for joy, you who were never in labor; because more are the children of the desolate woman than of her who has a husband,” says the Lord. 

“Enlarge the place of your tent, stretch your tent curtains wide, do not hold back; lengthen your cords, strengthen your stakes. For you will spread out to the right and to the left; your descendants will dispossess nations and settle in desolate cities.”  

— Isaiah 54:1-3 

Put it all together and you can see that the most important pieces of Christian theology are in a book written 700 years before Jesus was born. It’s almost as if God had planned this whole thing from the beginning! That’s why Jesus read a passage from the Book of Isaiah (61:1-2) when he announces the beginning of his public ministry (Luke 4:17-21). 

It all makes more sense when you look at it backwards. The time that we spend on this world is a tiny portion of a much larger picture. It's impossible for any of us to understand history as it is happening. The consequences of our own decisions and broader societal trends can play out hundreds of years after our deaths. 

What that means is that the only way to understand history is to read it back to front instead of front to back. There's a lot of stuff written in 2020 about what will happen in 2024. But we don't know who will be right because we can't predict the future. The only thing that we can do is read what was written in 2016 about what will happen in 2020. Better yet -- read stuff written in 2010 or 2000. Who was right about what would happen? Who was wrong? What were the thought process behind those predictions about the world? 

Don't read about the present to know about the future. Read the past to know about the present. The people who were right before are more likely to be right again. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results, as any stockbroker will tell you. But it's all we have to go on.

I first started paying attention to the news when I was in high school and college in the middle of the 2000s. The first story that I really followed closely was the second war in Iraq. The people pushing us to invade Iraq believed that Saddam Hussein was a danger to world peace, that he was building weapons of mass destruction that could be given to third parties, and that removing him from power would be the first step in a chain reaction that would permanently change the political structures in the Middle East. 

As it turns out, none of that was true. That's pretty obvious now that we have 15 years to evaluate those predictions. 

So why does that matter now? Because if the same people who said we should invade Iraq make new predictions about the future, we can remember what they said before and ask them what will be different this time. Maybe the holes in their worldview that were exposed by their failures in Iraq will be exposed again if we follow their advice. What have they learned from what went wrong last time? There's no way to "win" an argument about the future. But you can win one about the past because everyone has access to the same information. 

The past has the only answers that you can rely on. It’s always easier to lie about what will happen in the future than what has happened in the past. 

One of the best lines from "Game of Thrones" comes from what happens in the North after the Red Wedding. It would take too long to explain the context if you haven't watched the show so just know that the North was a group of people who were betrayed at the Red Wedding. Years after the fact, people in the North would end every toast by saying "The North Remembers". Memory is power. No matter how much you lie to us now, no matter how much you want to put the past in the past, do not forget that we have not forgotten. We remember.

Revenge is not a Christian concept. But remembering is. You have to remember what was said to you before. If you do not forget then you cannot be lied to. And if you cannot be lied to than you cannot be controlled. Don't let other people tell you what happened. Remember it for yourself. 

Christians have to know our history. We were right before which should give us confidence that will be right again. You can't prove that a prediction about the future will be correct. What you can do is prove that predictions in the past about the present were correct. 

Everything that happened in the Book of Isaiah is part of the historical record. His predictions about the past were proven accurate. The people of 700 BC didn’t have the benefit of seeing history from back to front. The just had to take Isaiah at his word. 

We have the benefit of hindsight to know that he was right. Isaiah told people what the new deal between God and Man would be. And then that new deal came to pass. It’s almost as if he was a messenger from a divine being who knew what would happen.

Isaiah 27

God will change the world. Not you or me. That is the hope that believers have to hold onto. 

In Chapter 27, the final section of the “Isaiah Apocalypse”, where the prophet outlines his vision of the end times, we see what the world looks like after the judgment of God. 

Isaiah returns to the analogy of the vineyard. In Chapter 5, God creates a vineyard (Israel in the Old Testament) that is corrupted by the world around it so he decides to tear it down and start over. His new vineyard (the Christian church in the New Testament) will be different. It will change the world instead to the world changing it: 

“I, the Lord, watch over the vineyard; I water it continually. I guard it day and night so that no one may harm it. I am not angry. If only there were briers and thorns confronting me! 

I would march agains them in battle; I would set them all on fire. Or else let them come to me for refuge; let them make peace with me, yes, let them make peace with me."

In days to come Jacob will take root, Israel will bud and blossom and fill all the world with fruit. 

— Isaiah 27:2-6 

The new vineyard will fill the world with fruit. Not because of anything that it will do. But because of what God will do for it. 

That is where Isaiah's confidence in the future comes from. There was no reason for him to have any. His people and his religion seemed doomed. 

Jesus had the same confidence. He was a no-account peasant from the middle of nowhere who was abandoned by even his closest friends at his death. The Roman Empire should have lasted a lot longer than the religion he founded. But Jesus knew something they didn’t: 

“Heaven and earth will pass away; but my words will never pass away.”  

— Matthew 24:25 

The Romans did everything they could to stamp out Christianity. They made it illegal and killed anyone they found practicing it. They murdered Jesus and they murdered Peter and Paul, too. 

Killing Jesus should have been enough. There was no one who could fill his shoes. His inner circle wasn't made up of wealthy and important people. The 12 disciples were mostly fishermen without any formal education. They were essentially guys with associates degrees who worked blue-collar jobs. It was the first thing the Jewish religious leaders picked up on. They couldn't believe people like that could speak so well:

When they saw the courage of Peter and John and realized that they were unschooled, ordinary men, they were astonished and they took note that these men had been with Jesus. 

— Acts 4:13  

That’s the difference between Man and God. Man changes the world from the top-down. God does it from the bottom-up. He doesn’t need people from Harvard and Yale. God can empower a community college graduate just as easily.

Peter was the first leader of the Christian church after Jesus. There was nothing particularly impressive about him. He’s a rash and impulsive character throughout the Gospels, constantly second-guessing Jesus and rarely grasping the meaning of his lessons. 

After spending three years together, Jesus gives Peter a series of tests on the eve of the crucifixion. He asks Peter to pray for him, and Peter falls asleep instead. When the Roman soldiers arrest Jesus, Peter chops off one of their ears, going against every single thing that Jesus had taught him about non-violence. He even tells Peter beforehand that he will deny him three times. Peter scoffs at the warning and then does it anyway.

He's not someone who should have been able to lead and grow a religion. Yet Jesus still trusted him with that authority. 

The whole point of being a Christian is that it doesn’t matter who you are or what you have done or even what kind of abilities that you have. God can still use you in miraculous ways beyond what you could do on your own. He actually enjoys doing it that way. 

God doesn’t want people who don't need Him to succeed because then He wouldn't get the credit for their accomplishments. No Christian does anything without God. That is the first lesson you learn when you start walking with Him. That's what this classic hymn is getting at:

I will not boast in anything; no gifts, no power, no wisdom /

But I will boast in Jesus Christ, His death and resurrection.

-- How Deep The Father's Love

No early Christian leader understood this more than Paul. He was the opposite of Peter and the disciples in every way. Paul wasn't a nobody in Jewish society. He was born into the 1% and advanced even further up the ranks on the strength of his intellectual brilliance and religious zealousness, the two things their culture valued the most:

If someone else thinks they have reasons to put confidence in the flesh, I have more: circumcised on the eighth day, of the people of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; in regard to the law, a Pharisee; as for zeal, persecuting the church; as for righteousness based on the law, faultless. But whatever were gains to me I now consider loss for the sake of Christ.

-- Philippians 3:4-7

Paul turned his back on everything his society said was important to follow God. He was in line to become the ancient Jewish version of a Supreme Court justice. That's what he's getting at when he talks about all the reasons that he has for "confidence in the flesh" [i.e himself]. He had checked every box and was climbing all the most important ladders. Think of him like a graduate of Harvard and Harvard Law who had clerked in the Supreme Court and was now a federal judge. Then he threw it all away to become a Christian. 

He went from persecuting the early Christians to being persecuted. He went from a religious scholar to a tentmaker, traveling from town to town and selling his goods in the market like his fellow believers, none of whom had his education.

History proved him right. Paul became one of the most influential thinkers in human history. His words have lived forever. But here's the important part. Peter is one of the most influential thinkers, too. He has his own letters in the Bible that people still pour over thousands of years later. And he didn't have 1% of Paul's natural ability or education. 

The world tells you need to check all these boxes to accomplish anything in your life. You need to go to this college. You need to know these people. You need to have this kind of career. God says you don’t need to do anything other than love Him. You don't have to be "special" in any way. He will do all the work. The pressure isn't on any Christian to do anything. Ask for help and help will be given. 

That certainly applies in my life. I had nothing going on before I was a Christian. I was broke, alone, and marginally employed. The only thing that separates me from a lot of folks on Basketball Twitter is that I asked God for help in my career. It really is that simple.

That's why the best thing that can happen to you in your life is to bottom out. Because that's when you realize that you can't get out of that hole without help from God. There are a lot of people in this world who don't ever need God. They were born on third base. They have everything figured out. That's what Jesus means when he says it's hard for a rich man to make it to heaven. They are doing just fine on their own. 

But that wasn't my story. It's probably not yours, either. The world wrote me off. I am where I am today because I wrote the world off and turned to God. It's the best decision you can make with your life. The only thing that it will cost you is your pride. 

Becoming a Christian is the opposite of selling your soul to the devil. You don't get to name your price. God isn't a genie. But He can do things for you far beyond your wildest dreams. You never know what will happen when you ask.

"Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened.

Which of you, if your son asks for bread, will give him a stone? Or if he asks for a fish, will give him a snake? If you, then, though you are evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father in heaven give good gifts to those who ask him!"

-- Matthew 7:7-11

Here are two facts that even non-believers can agree. Christianity changed the world even though Christians aren't the most impressive people in the world. It's what Isaiah promised all those years ago. And there are even more promises still ahead of us.

Isaiah 26

God will save us. That is the message that Isaiah returns to over and over again. It could not have been easy to believe.

Even though the Book of Isaiah is one of the longest (66 chapters) in the Bible, we don’t know that much about his life. It doesn’t say what he was doing before he became a prophet, or what he wanted to be. He mentions that he has a wife and two kids, but doesn’t talk about them much.

Here’s what we can assume. Isaiah probably didn’t want to spend almost 60 years telling people things they didn’t want to hear, and publicly humiliating himself to get his message across only to be ignored.

With me, it’s not just bars and music /
I walk with God. I got the scars to prove it.  

-- Mase 

But Isaiah never lost his faith, no matter how bad things got. He waited for God to move and trusted Him with the outcome:

You will keep in perfect peace those whose minds are steadfast, because they trust in you. Trust in the Lord forever, for the Lord himself, is the Rock eternal.  

— Isaiah 26:3-4 

Isaiah wasn’t speaking from a place of privilege. Things never really got better for him. He didn’t retire in comfort. He was executed at the very end of his life by a new king (Manasseh) who feared what he would say.

So how could he remain peaceful in spite of all his pain and suffering? How could he still trust in God when his faith was not rewarded?

The key was that he kept his focus on the big picture. He knew what was happening in the world was bigger than him. And that it was not the whole story:

But your dead will live, Lord; their bodies will rise — let those who dwell in the dust wake up and shout for joy — your dew is like the dew of the morning; the earth will give birth to her dead. 

— Isaiah 26:19 

You don’t have to be religious to see that nothing we do on this world will last. The sun will go supernova one day and wipe away any trace of the Earth. And we will all be forgotten long before that happens.

The question is what you will do with that knowledge. In George Orwell’s Animal Farm, the animals are sentient beings who are ruled unjustly by human farmers and begin to conspire to overthrow their masters. One key step for the conspirators is getting rid of Moses, a raven who works for the humans to keep the animals in chains:

“He claimed to know of the existence of a mysterious country called Sugarcandy Mountain, to which all animals went when they died. It was situated somewhere up in the sky, a little distance beyond the clouds, Moses said. In Sugarcandy Mountain it was Sunday seven days a week, clover was in season all the year round, and lump sugar and linseed cake grew on the hedges.  

The animals hated Moses because he told tales and did no work, but some of them believed in Sugarcandy Mountain, and the pigs had to argue very hard to persuade them that there was no such place.” 

This is a fairly obvious reference to the role of religion in society, which Karl Marx called “the opiate of the masses”. The idea being that it's only when people are freed from the comforting lies of what happens to them after death that they fight to improve their lives on Earth.

But the point of the book is that the conspirators, a group of pigs who represent the Communists in Soviet Russia, are pushing their own set of lies. There will be no freedom or equality after the revolution. The animals would just be exchanging one set of masters for another.

At the end of The Communist Manifesto, Marx promises that a class-less society where the state withers away will spontaneously emerge after the worldwide communist revolution. Does that seem any less plausible than Sugarcandy Mountain?

Maybe the causality is reversed. Maybe all the pain and suffering in this world is only a brief interval before before our glorious future where we are restored to a relationship with God. Maybe weeping stays for the night but joy comes in the morning. Maybe the people who are trying to sell the idea of heaven on earth are the ones pushing the lie, distracting you from your real purpose in this world and raising your hopes on a dream that will never come.

Or maybe not. Maybe this is all there is. Maybe the only hope we have is that man can be perfected and that we can all do our small part to create a more perfect society on Earth. What do you think becomes of a person who believes that, and puts their hope in other people? Is that faith ever rewarded?

In The Myth of Sisyphus, Albert Camus, an existential philosopher, tried to make sense of a world without God or any hope in the afterlife. He saw man as Sisyphus, a figure from Greek mythology who was doomed to push a boulder all they way to the top of the mountain, only to see it roll back down. And this same process happens over and over again for all of time.

This is what he concludes:

All Sisyphus' silent joy is contained therein. His fate belongs to him. His rock is a thing. Likewise, the absurd man, when he contemplates his torment, silences all the idols. In the universe suddenly restored to its silence, the myriad wondering little voices of the earth rise up.  

The absurd man says yes and his efforts will henceforth be unceasing. If there is a personal fate, there is no higher destiny, or at least there is, but one which he concludes is inevitable and despicable. For the rest, he knows himself to be the master of his days.  

At that subtle moment when man glances backward over his life, Sisyphus returning toward his rock, in that slight pivoting he contemplates that series of unrelated actions which become his fate, created by him, combined under his memory's eye and soon sealed by his death. Thus, convinced of the wholly human origin of all that is human, a blind man eager to see who knows that the night has no end, he is still on the go. The rock is still rolling.  

I leave Sisyphus at the foot of the mountain! One always finds one's burden again. But Sisyphus teaches the higher fidelity that negates the gods and raises rocks. He too concludes that all is well. This universe henceforth without a master seems to him neither sterile nor futile. Each atom of that stone, each mineral flake of that night filled mountain, in itself forms a world. The struggle itself toward the heights is enough to fill a man's heart. One must imagine Sisyphus happy.

For Camus, life is an absurd struggle with no happy ending. But one must find joy and hope in the struggle, in working to make the world a better place, even if it's for nothing. Essentially, happiness is found in the journey, not the destination.

I thought this was pretty dope when I was in college. But I can see how insane it is now. This is the best the world has to offer you. You are going to be a miserable wretch toiling for no reason with no chance to meaningfully change your fate ... and they expect you to be happy about it! 

Has that line of thought worked for anyone? Has walking away from God and embracing that philosophy made people happy and content? 

Isaiah knew where his hope came from. That’s why he never let the political turmoil in his lifetime bring him down. That’s why he was able to maintain perfect peace inspire of persecution. The world couldn’t touch him because he didn’t belong to it. He knew where he was going and that this was all going away one day.

Go, my people, enter your rooms and shut the doors behind you; hide yourselves for a little while until his wrath has passed by. 

-- Isaiah 26:20

Isaiah 25

The day of the Lord isn’t all bad news. God will judge the world. But He will also redeem it.

Isaiah describes the great banquet that will come after Judgment Day, a scene repeated at the end of the Book of Revelations (19:7-10):

On this mountain the Lord Almighty will prepare a feast of rich food for all peoples, a banquet of aged wine — the best of meats and the finest of wines.  

On this mountain he will destroy the shroud that enfolds all peoples, the sheet that covers all nations; He will swallow up death forever.  

The Sovereign Lord will wipe away the tears from all faces; he will removes his people’s disgrace from all the earth.  

— Isaiah 25:6-8 

An important distinction has been removed. The banquet is not just for “his people”. It is for “all people”.

All of mankind would one day worship the God of the Jews. It would have seemed like an outrageous claim at the time. Isaiah’s ministry occurred during one of the darkest times in Jewish history. There was one point when all that was left was a small remnant trapped in Jerusalem by one of the most powerful militaries in human history. It was over. The Assyrians would wipe them from the face of the Earth as if they had never existed, like they did too so many of their neighbors. How would their God be worshipped by everyone on Earth when there would soon be no one left who had even heard of Him?

Then a miracle happened. God saved His people and religion by destroying the Assyrian army in one night. Isaiah claims it was an “angel of the Lord” while historians say it must have been a plague. Either way, the result was the same.

But the people of Jerusalem didn't do anything to make that happen. God did. It would be the same on Judgment Day:

In that day they will say, “Surely this is our God; we trusted in him, and he saved us. This is the Lord, we trusted in him; let us rejoice and be glad in his salvation.”  

— Isaiah 25:9 

It makes more sense in hindsight. Isaiah anticipated Christian theology in ways no one in his time saw. Just as God saved His people outside the walls of Jerusalem in 701 BC, Jesus would save all of mankind on the cross.

None of us did anything to deserve his mercy. It was the opposite. We deserved the punishment that he received:

He was despised and rejected by mankind, a man of suffering and familiar with pain. Like one from whom people hide their faces he was despised, and we held him in low esteem.  

Surely he took up our pain and bore our suffering, yet we considered him punished by God, stricken by him, and afflicted.  

But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed by our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him, and by his wounds we are healed. [emphasis added]  

We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us had turned to our own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all.  

— Isaiah 53:3-6 

This passage (which describes someone called the “Suffering Servant”) was written 700 years before Jesus. And yet it reads like it could have been written 700 years after. The way that so many of his actions were predicted ahead of time is one of the most powerful arguments for why he is who he says he was.

Christianity starts with the sacrifice that he made. That is the foundation of our identity. We remember that we were saved by Jesus not because of what we did but because of who he is. Our value as human beings comes from the price that he paid for us. And we know where we are going after we die because of it.

The goal of Christian practice is to fully internalize this idea and live by its implications. Here are 7 principles of Christian life that we can take from our knowledge about the banquet in heaven:

1. Our distinctions in this world do not matter. It doesn’t matter how much (or how little) money you have made. It doesn’t matter what you do for a living. It doesn’t matter who your people are: "There is neither new Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is their male and female, for you all are one in Christ Jesus." (Galatians 3:28-29) The only distinction that matters is whether or not you will be at this banquet. 

2. Our actions do not get us there. No one gets there because they are a good person. The only way to get there is if Jesus pays for you to be there. It’s his party. We are just guests. 

3. We have to be thankful for getting in. Jesus paid the ultimate price to get us a spot at the table. So no matter what happens to you in this world, there is still plenty to be thankful for. What happens in this world ultimately does not matter: "For everything in this world — the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life — comes not from the Father but from the world. The world and its desires pass away, but whoever does the will of God lives forever." (1 John 2:17-18)  

4. We do not need to serve ourselves in our time on Earth. There is no need to strive after personal goals. We have already been given the ultimate prize. So we can turn our focus to other people. We can help them and bless them. And that has more value than trying to bless ourselves. 

5. The most important thing we can do other people is to help them get in. What good is it to gain the world but lose your soul? (Mark 8:36) If you are helping someone without telling them about the banquet, then you aren’t really helping them.

6. The people who aren’t invited will be mad. No one likes not being on the VIP list. Even if it’s their own fault for not being on it. Jesus warned his disciples about that: “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you. Remember what I told: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also.’” (John 15:18-20) 

7. The way you live your life will attract people. If your identity is built on a rock, then nothing the world can do will chip it away. The world is a dark place. Life is hard. We all need hope. We all need faith. Most people don't have either. They know everything they are doing is for nothing. Their best case scenario is that life is meaningless and that they won't exist after they die. We can offer them something better. We can live our lives secure in the knowledge of where we are going. They might test us to see if we really believe it. But eventually they will want that hope for themselves.  

Christians are like people making a long drive to a five-star banquet. The snacks we get along the way do not matter. Nor does it matter if someone else is eating better ones. There is a whole different level of food where we are going. We just have to tell people that they are invited, too. What they do with that information is up to them.